Yvonne Maria Werner (ed.), Christian Masculinity: Men and Religion in Northern Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, Leuven: Leuven University Press 2011, 322 p., 38.99 EUR, ISBN: 978-9058678737
Christian Masculinity examines men in the Catholic and Protestant traditions in Northern European countries from the mid-nineteenth to the early twentieth century. Based on a research project conducted by Swedish scholars (with assistance of and in collaboration with researchers from England, Germany, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, and Belgium), the volume presents case studies of religious men in the contested terrain of the role of the churches and religious life during the rise of secular modernity.
As religion became increasingly a private matter, it seemed that men
were leaving the church to seek success in the worldly public domain
while women remained attracted to Christianity due to what was then
considered women’s “natural” inclination toward devotion and piety.
Historians of religion and church historians have explained this
nineteenth-century phenomenon with the theory of the feminization of
Christianity. Evidence suggests that “religion was discursively
feminized at least as early as the 1820s,” writes David Tjeder, “and
quantitative studies reveal that in the second half of the nineteenth
century church attendance and communion were dominated by women . . .
leaving clergymen facing churches filled with women” (p. 134-35). This
feminization theory, according to the editor Yvonne Werner, has become
“the master narrative within modern research on religion and gender”
(p. 8). But does this theory capture the complexity of gender relations
at the turn of the last century? Does it theorize the male gender
adequately? Does it render religious men invisible? Can it explain the
“large numbers of men who were committed to the church and the
Christian faith” (p. 9) during these decades?
Christian Masculinity suggests that the relations between
gender, the churches, and modernity are more dynamic and contentious
than the feminization theory allows for. If one were to restrict
oneself to the master narrative of the feminization of Christianity,
one would remain oblivious to the more nuanced ways that religious men
claimed their roles and confessional identifications “between 1840 and
1940” (p. 10); one would also have to disregard the churches’ efforts
at mobilizing counter-strategies to “the secularization of society and
the feminization of religion,” which aimed at “restor[ing] and
reinforc[ing] male domination in the religious sphere” (p. 13). The
contributing researchers seem to agree that it is time to take a
“critical attitude towards the feminization theory” (p. 10).
Such a shared starting point gives Christian Masculinity a
cohesiveness that often is missing in other edited volumes on religion
and gender. Assuming a common (albeit not monolithic) theoretical
framework, the thirteen contributors pursue the hypothesis that
Christianity responded to secularism with re-confessionalizing and
re-masculinizing efforts, and they probe this hypothesis in
locality-specific sites. Erik Sidenvall, in his biographical study of a
Swedish Protestant missionary to China, articulates perhaps most
succinctly the shared understanding:
Indeed, it is Blaschke’s research on the “second confessional age” that
seemed to have spirited this project. According to Blaschke, the second
confessional age (1830-1960) was marked by both church consolidation
and conflicts between the denominations; the combative mood of both
consolidation and denominational battles compensated “for the
feminization of religion, since confessionalism was the arena in which
male virtues and powers, used in the service of religion, could let off
steam in a legitimate way” (p. 38).
With a few exceptions, most of the volume’s chapters proceed historically, analyzing church documents, official correspondence, personal letters, biographies, or institutional developments. Only the last three chapters do not follow this disciplinary approach, with Inger Littberger Caisou-Rousseau’s literary analysis of male protagonists in three classical Swedish novels, Anders Jarlert’s biographical profile of Queen Victoria, Sweden’s “manliest man in the Royal family” (p. 257), and Gösta Hallinsten’s reflections on what he calls the “new Catholic feminism,” inspired by Hans Urs von Balthasar, Edith Stein, and John Paul II). Halinsten’s article, however, is disappointingly apologetic toward a normative theological anthropology that posits gender complementarity and presumes a “non-negotiable,” “bodily-grounded sex difference” (p. 292).
The other chapters visit specific local sites in which issues of
masculinity (or re-masculinization) are constructed, debated, defended,
rejected, or theologized. The objects of these historical case studies
include Lutheran theologians from the Swedish High Lund group; a
Belgian movement of male devotion to the Sacred Heart; Dutch
Dominicans in the 1930s; an analysis of obituaries of Swedish priests
regarding “clerical manliness” (p. 118); a portraiture of the Swedish
bishop Eklund, who combined Christianity, nationalism, and muscular
manliness in his polemics against “unmanly” secular men; Swedish male
missionaries in China; Catholic missionaries in Scandinavia;
evangelizing efforts among Swedish military conscripts by creating
so-called “soldiers’ homes” (p. 192); and the charismatic masculinity
embodied by the founder of the Danish “folk high schools”
(213).
Readers with special interest in church history of Northern Europe will particularly profit from these chapters. People less interested in the details of local case studies within a predominantly Swedish context will still benefit from reading Christian Masculinity because the themes addressed can easily be transferred to other locality-specific sites. Some of the issues that weave through this volume and are significant beyond the regions covered pertain to the intersectionality of nationalism, religion, and masculinity, to gender fluidity in the lives of individual religious men, and to homosocial bonding as a site of pleasure and masculinizing reaffirmation. Another recurring theme is the mutual polemics that seek to portray “other” men as unmanly (Christian men were unmanly according to secularists; Catholics were not men enough according to Protestants; only a virtuous defender of faith was truly manly, according to Catholics, etc.).
In addition to the need for broad theoretical work on masculinity, like Pierre Bourdieu’s and R. W. Connell’s influential theories (which are frequently referenced in Christian Masculinity), this volume demonstrates masterfully that we must also study men and religion at the micro-level. Anne-Marie Korte states in a different context that the field of religion and gender (and masculinity in particular) must pay attention to questions of “locality and loyalty, privilege and marginalization, and objectivity and embodiment” (Religion and Gender 1:1 [2011], p. 9; accessed January 30, 2013). Christian Masculinity models this kind of project.
Reviewer:
Björn Krondorfer.
Refbacks
- Im Moment gibt es keine Refbacks
Tübingen Open Journals - Datenschutz